Our objective was to identify
where that common interest occurs geographically to inform conservation planning.\n\nLocation The study focused on 2112 eight-digit hydrologic units (watersheds) occurring in the conterminous United States.\n\nMethods Data on aquatic-dependent species occurrence, drinking QNZ in vivo water intakes, protected land status and land cover change were compiled for each watershed. We compared these four datasets after defining ‘hotspots’ based on attribute-specific thresholds that included (1) the 90th percentile of at-risk aquatic biodiversity, (2) with and without drinking water intakes, (3) above and below the median percentage of protected land and (4) increase in urban land above and below a 1% threshold between 2001 and 2006. Geographic intersections were used to address a number of
questions relevant to conservation planning including the following: What watersheds important to aquatic biodiversity are also important to drinking water? Which watersheds with a shared stake in biodiversity and drinking water protection have inadequate land protection? Which watersheds with potentially inadequate amounts of protected lands are also undergoing relatively rapid urbanization?\n\nResults Over 60% of the watersheds that were determined to be aquatic biodiversity hotspots also had drinking water intakes, and approximately 50% www.selleckchem.com/products/cbl0137-cbl-0137.html of these watersheds had less than the United States median amount of protected land. A total of seven watersheds were found to have shared aquatic biodiversity/drinking water values, relatively low proportions of protected lands and a relatively high rate of urbanization. The majority of these watershed occurred in the south-eastern United States, with secondary occurrences in California.\n\nMain conclusions Geographic
analysis of multiple ecosystem services can identify areas of Stem Cell Compound Library datasheet shared land conservation interest. Locations where ecosystem commodities and species conservation overlap has the potential to increase stakeholder buy-in and leverage scarce resources to conserve land that, in this case study, protects both biodiversity and drinking water.”
“Background: To compare the outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT) between two different angiographic subtypes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: Ninety-three consecutive cases of PCV were classified into two phenotypes (42 type 1 and 51 type 2) according to the presence or absence of feeding vessels found on indocyanine green angiography. Full-dose PDT and retreatments were performed every 3 months as needed based on the findings on angiography. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was compared as the main outcome between type 1 and type 2 PCV up to 12 months after the initial PDT. Results: The baseline greatest linear dimension (GLD) was significantly larger in type 1 PCV than type 2 PCV. The mean BCVA was significantly improved from baseline in type 2 PCV, while no improvement was found in type 1 PCV.